ÿþ<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=unicode"> <meta name=ProgId content=Word.Document> <meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15"> <meta name=Originator content="Microsoft Word 15"> <link rel=File-List href="v3.fld/filelist.xml"> <link rel=Edit-Time-Data href="v3.fld/editdata.mso"> <!--[if !mso]> <style> v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif]--> <title>Title</title> <link rel=themeData href="v3.fld/themedata.thmx"> <link rel=colorSchemeMapping href="v3.fld/colorschememapping.xml"> <!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Print</w:View> <w:Zoom>210</w:Zoom> <w:SpellingState>Clean</w:SpellingState> <w:GrammarState>Clean</w:GrammarState> <w:TrackMoves>false</w:TrackMoves> <w:TrackFormatting/> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF/> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-GB</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables/> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/> <m:brkBin m:val="before"/> <m:brkBinSub m:val="&#45;-"/> <m:smallFrac m:val="off"/> <m:dispDef/> <m:lMargin m:val="0"/> <m:rMargin m:val="0"/> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/> <m:intLim m:val="subSup"/> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false" DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="375"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toc 9"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footer"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="index heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of figures"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="envelope return"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="footnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="line number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="page number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="endnote text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="table of authorities"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="macro"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="toa heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Bullet 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Number 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Closing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="List Continue 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Message Header"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Salutation"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Date"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text First Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Note Heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Body Text Indent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Block Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Hyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="FollowedHyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Document Map"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Plain Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="E-mail Signature"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Top of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Bottom of Form"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal (Web)"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Acronym"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Address"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Cite"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Code"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Definition"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Keyboard"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Preformatted"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Sample"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Typewriter"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="HTML Variable"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Normal Table"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="annotation subject"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="No List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Outline List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Simple 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Classic 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Colorful 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Columns 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Grid 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 7"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table List 8"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table 3D effects 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Contemporary"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Elegant"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Professional"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Subtle 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Web 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Balloon Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="Table Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Table Theme"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Placeholder Text"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" Name="Revision"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" Name="Light List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Bibliography"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="41" Name="Plain Table 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="42" Name="Plain Table 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="43" Name="Plain Table 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="44" Name="Plain Table 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="45" Name="Plain Table 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="40" Name="Grid Table Light"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="Grid Table 1 Light Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="Grid Table 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="Grid Table 3 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="Grid Table 4 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="Grid Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="Grid Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="Grid Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 1"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 2"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 3"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 4"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 5"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="46" Name="List Table 1 Light Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="47" Name="List Table 2 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="48" Name="List Table 3 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="49" Name="List Table 4 Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="50" Name="List Table 5 Dark Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="51" Name="List Table 6 Colorful Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="52" Name="List Table 7 Colorful Accent 6"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Mention"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Smart Hyperlink"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Hashtag"/> <w:LsdException Locked="false" SemiHidden="true" UnhideWhenUsed="true" Name="Unresolved Mention"/> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <style> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"; panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:roman; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1107305727 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:Calibri; panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536859905 -1073732485 9 0 511 0;} @font-face {font-family:Times; panose-1:0 0 5 0 0 0 0 2 0 0; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-536870145 1342185562 0 0 415 0;} @font-face {font-family:"Trebuchet MS"; panose-1:2 11 6 3 2 2 2 2 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:647 0 0 0 159 0;} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:-520081665 -1073717157 41 0 66047 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-name:"Normal\,Standard Text"; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} h1 {mso-style-name:"Heading 1\,Header 1"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; margin-top:12.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:17.0pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:-17.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; page-break-after:avoid; mso-outline-level:1; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-font-kerning:0pt; font-weight:normal;} h2 {mso-style-name:"Heading 2\,Header 2"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; margin-top:12.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:1.0cm; text-align:justify; text-indent:-1.0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; page-break-after:avoid; mso-outline-level:2; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; font-weight:normal;} h3 {mso-style-name:"Heading 3\,Header 3"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; margin-top:12.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:-35.45pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; page-break-after:avoid; mso-outline-level:3; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; font-weight:normal;} h4 {mso-style-name:"Heading 4\,Header 4"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; page-break-after:avoid; mso-outline-level:4; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; font-weight:normal;} p.MsoFootnoteText, li.MsoFootnoteText, div.MsoFootnoteText {mso-style-name:"Footnote Text\,Footnote"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.MsoCommentText, li.MsoCommentText, div.MsoCommentText {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Comment Text Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.MsoHeader, li.MsoHeader, div.MsoHeader {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Header Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.MsoFooter, li.MsoFooter, div.MsoFooter {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Footer Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:right; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} span.MsoFootnoteReference {mso-style-name:"Footnote Reference\,Footnote Number"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; vertical-align:super;} span.MsoPageNumber {mso-style-name:"Page Number\,Page Numbers"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Trebuchet MS"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Trebuchet MS";} span.MsoEndnoteReference {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; vertical-align:super;} p.MsoEndnoteText, li.MsoEndnoteText, div.MsoEndnoteText {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Endnote Text Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.MsoBlockText, li.MsoBlockText, div.MsoBlockText {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; margin-top:12.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; color:purple; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} p.MsoCommentSubject, li.MsoCommentSubject, div.MsoCommentSubject {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Comment Subject Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; font-weight:bold;} p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char"; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:8.0pt; font-family:"Tahoma",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.MsoRMPane, li.MsoRMPane, div.MsoRMPane {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.MsoBibliography, li.MsoBibliography, div.MsoBibliography {mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:37; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:-36.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} span.Heading1Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 1 Char\,Header 1 Char"; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-ansi-font-size:16.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:16.0pt; font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:major-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:major-bidi; color:#2F5496; mso-themecolor:accent1; mso-themeshade:191;} span.Heading2Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 2 Char\,Header 2 Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-ansi-font-size:13.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:13.0pt; font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:major-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:major-bidi; color:#2F5496; mso-themecolor:accent1; mso-themeshade:191;} span.Heading3Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 3 Char\,Header 3 Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:major-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:major-bidi; color:#1F3763; mso-themecolor:accent1; mso-themeshade:127;} span.Heading4Char {mso-style-name:"Heading 4 Char\,Header 4 Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:9; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Calibri Light",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-ascii-theme-font:major-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:major-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:"Calibri Light"; mso-hansi-theme-font:major-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:major-bidi; color:#2F5496; mso-themecolor:accent1; mso-themeshade:191; font-style:italic;} p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0 {mso-style-name:msonormal; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} span.FootnoteTextChar {mso-style-name:"Footnote Text Char\,Footnote Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;} span.CommentTextChar {mso-style-name:"Comment Text Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Comment Text"; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;} span.HeaderChar {mso-style-name:"Header Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:Header; mso-ansi-font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;} span.FooterChar {mso-style-name:"Footer Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:Footer; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Trebuchet MS"; mso-hansi-font-family:"Trebuchet MS";} span.EndnoteTextChar {mso-style-name:"Endnote Text Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Endnote Text"; font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-bidi-font-family:Calibri;} span.CommentSubjectChar {mso-style-name:"Comment Subject Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Comment Subject"; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-font-family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold;} span.BalloonTextChar {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char"; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-locked:yes; mso-style-link:"Balloon Text"; mso-ansi-font-size:9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:9.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-ascii-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.Abstract, li.Abstract, div.Abstract {mso-style-name:Abstract; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.Keywords, li.Keywords, div.Keywords {mso-style-name:Keywords; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.Acknowledgement, li.Acknowledgement, div.Acknowledgement {mso-style-name:Acknowledgement; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:18.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.TitelText, li.TitelText, div.TitelText {mso-style-name:"Titel Text"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:18.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:16.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; font-weight:bold;} p.Author, li.Author, div.Author {mso-style-name:Author; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:14.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.AuthorContact, li.AuthorContact, div.AuthorContact {mso-style-name:"Author Contact"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Trebuchet MS",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; font-style:italic;} p.References, li.References, div.References {mso-style-name:References; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:1.0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; text-indent:-14.2pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.FormatvorlageErsteZeile0cm, li.FormatvorlageErsteZeile0cm, div.FormatvorlageErsteZeile0cm {mso-style-name:"Formatvorlage Erste Zeile\: 0 cm"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.FigureTable, li.FigureTable, div.FigureTable {mso-style-name:"Figure\/Table"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:12.0pt; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:12.0pt; margin-left:0cm; text-align:center; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.Quotation, li.Quotation, div.Quotation {mso-style-name:Quotation; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:6.0pt; margin-right:11.35pt; margin-bottom:6.0pt; margin-left:11.35pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; font-style:italic;} p.AbouttheAuthor, li.AbouttheAuthor, div.AbouttheAuthor {mso-style-name:"About the Author"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.ColorfulList-Accent11, li.ColorfulList-Accent11, div.ColorfulList-Accent11 {mso-style-name:"Colorful List - Accent 11"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpFirst, li.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpFirst, div.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpFirst {mso-style-name:"Colorful List - Accent 11CxSpFirst"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpMiddle, li.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpMiddle, div.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpMiddle {mso-style-name:"Colorful List - Accent 11CxSpMiddle"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpLast, li.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpLast, div.ColorfulList-Accent11CxSpLast {mso-style-name:"Colorful List - Accent 11CxSpLast"; mso-style-unhide:no; margin-top:0cm; margin-right:0cm; margin-bottom:0cm; margin-left:36.0pt; margin-bottom:.0001pt; text-align:justify; text-indent:18.0pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} p.references0, li.references0, div.references0 {mso-style-name:references; mso-style-unhide:no; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:Times; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p.msochpdefault, li.msochpdefault, div.msochpdefault {mso-style-name:msochpdefault; mso-style-unhide:no; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; margin-right:0cm; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0cm; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;} span.SpellE {mso-style-name:""; mso-spl-e:yes;} span.GramE {mso-style-name:""; mso-gram-e:yes;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:595.3pt 841.9pt; margin:70.9pt 70.9pt 70.9pt 70.9pt; mso-header-margin:35.4pt; mso-footer-margin:35.4pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} --> </style> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;} </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026"/> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit"> <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1"/> </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--> </head> <body lang=EN-GB link=blue vlink=purple style='tab-interval:36.0pt'> <div class=WordSection1> <p class=Author align=left style='text-align:left'><b><span style='font-size: 16.0pt'> Business Model and  Monetisation : On the Uses of Buzzwords</span></b></p> <p class=Author><b><span style='font-size:16.0pt'>Tom Streeter</span></b></p> <p class=AuthorContact align=left style='text-align:left'>Western University, London, Canada, <a href="mailto:tstreet2@uwo.ca">tstreet2@uwo.ca</a>, <a href="https://streeter.fims.uwo.ca">https://streeter.fims.uwo.ca</a> </p> <p class=MsoNormal align=left style='text-align:left;text-indent:0cm'><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p> <p class=Abstract><b>Abstract:</b> This essay explores the function of corporate buzzwords by investigating the early histories of  business model and  monetisation . It analyses the terms as examples of managerial argot, and argues that at key moments in the formation of digital capitalism, the terms helped create a field of action where management communities could envision, discuss, and coordinate, in a safely depoliticised way, the fact that markets and property are not natural, that social and political choices are necessary to create markets and property out of human relations that are not self-evidently things. Analysing the terms, not as ideologies, but as what Raymond Williams called  social experiences in solution , the essay focuses on the terms emergence <i>before</i> the regimes of accumulation with which they are now associated. This analysis suggests that close attention to language in historical context can help illuminate the emergence of political economic changes, showing that the rise of digital capitalism can be seen as, at the outset, as an effect, as much as a cause, of particular structures of feeling. It also suggests that scholars of current trends should not take for granted current buzzwords, but should treat their use and definition as sites of struggle. </p> <p class=Keywords><b>Keywords:</b> <i>Keywords</i>, discourse, managerial argot, culture and political economy, business model, monetisation, Raymond Williams</p> <p class=Acknowledgement><b>Acknowledgement:</b> Thanks to the many individuals who provided immensely helpful comments on this work, especially Pier-Pascale Boulanger, Eric <span class=SpellE>Guthey</span>, Lisa Henderson, and <span class=SpellE>tripleC s</span> anonymous reviewers. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:17.0pt;text-indent:-17.0pt'><b>1.</b><b><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>Introduction</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'><b>&nbsp;</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>The world of media management has its buzzwords. From synergy to innovation to disruption, buzzwords are uttered with great seriousness and scoffed at in equal measure. While individual terms rise and fall in popularity, the general presence at upper levels of management of vaguely defined but enthusiastically repeated buzzwords is a constant. The media industries are hardly unique in this; consider academic administration. Yet it remains an empirical fact that those who govern media institutions regularly use unique terms and phrases to describe aspects of industry strategy and structure coloured more by enthusiasm than precision. The words are part of doing business, and one of the tasks of scholarship is to understand how business gets done.</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>This essay explores the early careers of two of these buzzwords,  business model and  monetise. The question it seeks to answer is, why, in spite of their vagueness, do certain terms become common in management, and what does this tell us about the organisation of digital industries? It describes the terms as examples of managerial argot, and argues they have functioned to help enable and naturalise the collective work necessary to carving market relations and capital flows out of social activities like computer networking and digital media. Using textual analysis as a way to capture managerial structures of feeling, and contextualising them with a contradictions-of-capital sense of industrial evolution, this essay argues that the terms have helped create a field of action where management communities could envision, discuss, and coordinate, in a safely depoliticised way, the fact that markets and property are not natural, that it takes premarket institutional structures and collective effort  that it takes social and political choices  to create markets and property out of human relations that are not self-evidently things. Significantly, the terms rose to popularity <i>before</i> new industrial practices fell clearly into place; the terms did not appear to describe a set of practices already in existence, but appeared prior to, and thus helped set the conditions for, those new patterns to settle in. The peculiarities of everyday language are in this case shown to have a causal, rather than reflective, role in the emergence of digital capitalist social relations. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The next section lays out an approach to analysing language and social relations rooted in Raymond Williams, and distinguishes managerial argot from jargon, terms of art, ideology, and keywords. Section 3 begins with the existing literature on business models, noting that most works seek to clarify the term rather than analysing it as it is actually used. The section then goes on to explore the emergence of the term alongside the internet, using readings of early uses of the term to illustrate how, from the point of view of managers, it helped generate a terrain for action in the face of the deep uncertainties created by digitalisation and resultant tensions with classical ideas about markets. Section 4 explores the rise of  monetise in the 2000-2017 period, showing how it performed a similar function around the rise of social media, but in a post-dotcom bubble environment with heightened anxieties concerning profit generation. Section 5 concludes that more work on managerial argot could further contribute to our understandings of economic structures, and that rather than uncritically using current, emerging forms of argot (e.g.,  AI ), scholars would do well to approach them as sites of struggle. </p> <h1><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt'>2.</span></b><b><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></b><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'>Approach<o:p></o:p></span></b></h1> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>Words are, in small and large ways, world-making, and often enough the worlds they make are capitalist. But how exactly is the role of language best understood? Raymond Williams, throughout his work, was concerned that we not mistake  terms of analysis for terms of substance (Williams 1978, 179), i.e., that we not point to abstractions  e.g., neoliberalism, platform capitalism  as <i>causes</i> of social change when they might be better understood as outcomes. Towards that end, Williams famously defined structures of feeling as distinct from and typically appearing prior to formal systems of thought or ideologies. He called attention specifically to  social experiences in solution, as distinct from other social semantic formations which have been precipitated and are more evidently and immediately available (1978, 133 34). Williams thus advocated that, to grasp  meanings and values as they are actively lived and felt, we should seek out  social experiences in solution <i>before</i> they have precipitated into institutionalised processes and ideologies. He argued that  forms and conventions  semantic figures  [...] are often among the very first indications that such a new structure is forming (1978, 132 33). The terms <i>business model</i> and <i>monetisation</i>, I hope to show, were in their early years such instruments of structures-in-formation. They need not be understood as false consciousness, as merely ruses that pulled the wool over the eyes of the gullible for purposes originating elsewhere. Rather, they were generative of institutional possibilities. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>In contrast with the more formally inclined methods of critical discourse analysis (Jessop 2004) or the  distant reading (Oberhelman 2015) of quantitative corpus analysis, Williams insists on the necessity of a kind of close reading attuned to lived experience,  actively lived and felt meanings, which involves seeking to grasp words as used by individuals acting with specific concerns in historical context. Stuart Hall s oft-quoted admonition to begin qualitative analysis with  a long preliminary soak (Steiner 2016) in the materials is evocative, but the process can be understood as less vague than that phrase makes it sound. The  point of view of a speaker is something specific: the speakers  in the examples here largely high tech and media managers quoted by business journalists  are trying to solve specific problems in specific contexts, and are speaking to specific, though often multiple, audiences (e.g., other managers and a broader public) as they do so. Seeking to reconstruct what it felt like to be that type of person at that moment in history, the question then becomes, why these words and phrases and not others?&nbsp; Done iteratively, one can then tease out the play of meanings, with an eye towards relations of power. In sum, the method is to ask, what are the circumstances in which specific terms might seem useful rather than vague or <span class=SpellE>obfuscatory</span>? From what point of view did these terms solve problems? </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'><b>2.1 Specifying Managerial Argot</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'> Managerial argot , as I use the term here, is like most jargon in that it involves frequently used specialised insider terms one of whose functions is to indicate membership in a group<a name="_ftnref1"></a><a href="#_ftn1"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref1'><sup>[1]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref1'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref1'></span>. But managerial argot has its own distinct characteristics. It is not the same as highly technical terminology with very specific meanings originating in law (e.g.  residuals ) or engineering (e.g.  4K HD ), though it sometimes masquerades as such. Managerial argot, furthermore, is distinct from craft terms of art (e.g.,  pulling focus ) which are for internal use. Managerial argot has a public function. In this sense, it shares something with the often-disparaged tradition of inventive terminology for firing workers (Yen 2008). Renaming a mass firing a  downsizing or  rightsizing or  re-engineering clarifies nothing for those being laid off, but may soften the meanings of the action for those outside the company. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Managerial argot, however, is less self-evidently obscurantist than are euphemisms for layoffs. It is frequently enunciated with some enthusiasm, and is associated with ambition and vision. Managerial argot thus shares something with what Williams identified as a  key word , that is, a word in which  the problems of its meanings seemed [...]&nbsp; inextricably bound up with the problems it was being used to discuss (Williams 2014; <span class=SpellE>Ghaziani</span> and <span class=SpellE>Ventresca</span> 2005). Keywords and managerial argot share the quality of lacking consensus about precise definitions or referents, precisely because they are embedded in historical tensions and quandaries.&nbsp; In both cases, there is little point to searching for fixed, singular meanings, or trying to determine correct or incorrect uses. If the meaning seems shifting or tangled or contested, this is because of the circumstances being grappled with, not a simple lack of clarity on the part of the speaker. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>However, Williams key words such as  democracy and  culture are broadly public, involving grand issues of the day, are used in the context of efforts to enunciate general or universal principles, and emerge over centuries. A statement about democracy, whether or not clearly defined, generally presents the term to its audience as something that can be universally understood. Managerial argot, in contrast, appears and disappears over periods of a decade or two, and asserts authority more than a claim to universal understanding; if its meaning is somewhat obscure to outsiders, that is part of its appeal. A statement about monetisation is uttered from a position of special expertise where it is not assumed that all listeners should be able to understand, only in the hope that all listeners should respect the speaker s expertise, while those listeners sharing the speaker s goals  other managers  are expected to accept the meanings in context. Media industry managerial argot, in sum, while enunciated with an eye towards public reception, operates in narrower contexts and works to mark the speaker s expertise rather than to assert universal legibility. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:17.0pt;text-indent:-17.0pt'><b>3.</b><b><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif'>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span>The Emergence of  Business Model 1990-2000</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>The pop investor website Investopedia.com defines  business model as  a high-level plan for profitably operating a particular business in a specific marketplace (Kopp 2020). That definition reflects contemporary popular usage, but does not really distinguish the term from a business strategy, business plan, or just  business in the sense of  my business is . . . . In 1999, this vagueness around the then-newly popular term famously prompted journalist Michael Lewis to quip,   [b]<span class=SpellE>usiness</span> model is one of those terms of art that were central to the Internet boom: it glorified all manner of half-baked plans. All it really meant was how you planned to make money &nbsp; (Lewis 1999, 256 57). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Much of the literature about the meaning of <i>business model</i> reacts to its chronic vagueness by offering more precise definitions (Baden-Fuller and Morgan 2010; <span class=SpellE>Hedman</span> and <span class=SpellE>Kalling</span> 2003; <span class=SpellE>Magretta</span> 2002; Nielsen and Lund 2014; <span class=SpellE>Ovans</span> 2015; <span class=SpellE>Zott</span>, Amit, and Massa 2011). For example, <span class=SpellE>Magretta</span> (2002) responded to Lewis quip by arguing that  business model is in fact a useful term that can be distinguished from business strategy, but only if used a particular way. In developing her more specific definition, however, <span class=SpellE>Magretta</span> ends up not only distinguishing her definition from many uses of the term, but also includes examples from business history that were not called business models at the time, such as Sears efforts in the 1980s to offer financial services. <span class=SpellE>Ovan s</span> similar 2015 summary of such efforts to clarify the term goes further, including, for example, Gillette s early 20<sup>th</sup> century strategy of selling-razors-to-sell-razor-blades as a classic illustration of a business model. Such efforts to clarify have their value, but they essentially seek to generate a new meaning for the term, detaching it from common uses while <span class=SpellE>ahistorically</span> attaching it to phenomena which were not called business models in the past. In the name of clarity, they seek to take the term out of history. Here, rather than trying to swim against the tide of common usage, I hope to show that management buzzwords are best understood in the flow of history.</p> <p class=MsoNormal align=left style='text-align:left;text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;text-indent:0cm'><span style='mso-no-proof:yes'><img border=0 width=600 id="_x0000_i1027" src="http://triple-c.at/f/streeter_f1.jpg" alt="Chart, line chart&#10;&#10;Description automatically generated"></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;text-indent:0cm'>Figure 1</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>Studies of books, news media, and academic business journals agree that the phrase business model began to proliferate around 1990 and that it has multiple meanings in everyday use (<span class=SpellE>Codrea Rado</span> 2013; <span class=SpellE>Doganova</span> and <span class=SpellE>Muniesa</span> 2015; <span class=SpellE>Ghaziani</span> and <span class=SpellE>Ventresca</span> 2005; <span class=SpellE>Zott</span>, Amit, and Massa 2011)<a name="_ftnref2"></a><a href="#_ftn2"><span style='mso-bookmark: _ftnref2'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[2]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref2'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref2'></span>. This is confirmed by a simple year-by-year count in mainstream news outlets of articles containing  business model. Figure 1 shows that the term started to appear with some frequency in 1990, just as computer networking began to move from a specialised research context into broader public consciousness<a name="_ftnref3"></a><a href="#_ftn3"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref3'><sup>[3]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref3'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref3'></span>.</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>One can see in figure 1 that, after first appearing around 1990, growth in use of the term takes off substantially around the time of the 1995 Netscape Initial Public Offering (IPO), which launched the dotcom stock bubble.<a name="_ftnref4"></a><a href="#_ftn4"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref4'><sup>[4]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref4'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref4'></span> The slight downturn in number of articles using the phrase from 2000-2003 coincides rather precisely with the collapse of the dotcom stock bubble, which further hints at an enduring connection of the phrase to the rise of the internet and digital networking, something the efforts to give the term a precise meaning have difficulty explaining<a name="_ftnref5"></a><a href="#_ftn5"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref5'><sup>[5]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref5'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref5'></span>. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'><b>3.1 Deciphering Meaning: Textual Analysis, Context, and Experience</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'><b>&nbsp;</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>Word frequency counts alone cannot explain <i>why</i> terms suddenly become meaningful or, more importantly, the structures of feeling in which terms are experienced as useful. To better understand why it would make sense to assertively use a vaguely defined term in management contexts, some historical context combined with close reading are in order. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>In the 1980s, the rise of the microcomputer generated much confusion in the computer industry, as things moved from a handful of corporations selling a narrow range of hugely expensive devices to a proliferation of start-ups selling a flood of devices with different but overlapping capacities. As one 1984 overview dryly put it,  With today's multitiered, overlapping set of programmable computer classes, where and how computing can be done and how much it will cost can vary considerably (Bell 1984, 14). A 1990 review of the computing industry as a whole addressed the confusion in this way: </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'> Mainframe, minicomputer and personal computers have therefore been mapped onto a business model consisting of three tiers; corporate activities (mainframe), departmental activities (minicomputer or local area network) and personal computing (Lawrence 1990). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>Significantly, this early use of the term business model does not involve explaining exactly how firms would be making profits; it did not specify what would be the razors and what would be the razor blades. Rather, it was more an effort to assert a kind of abstract coherence in the face of managerial uncertainty. The industry is uncertain about which computers should be used for what purpose, the argument went, so they are using a distinction between centralised corporate activities, departmental activities, and personal computing in the hope that that will clarify things. (The distinction would not hold; within a few years the boundaries between the categories of mainframes, minicomputers, LANS, and PCs would become <span class=GramE>more blurry</span>, not less.)&nbsp; </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>That same month, in another early and revealing example, the <i>New York Times</i> quoted Sun Microsystems Chief Financial Officer:</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'> We have a sensitive business model [...] When you're a growing company, and you're <span class=SpellE>laying</span> on expenses at the rate that we are, you have to be very sensitive to changes in projected revenue (Markoff 1990). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>Why a  sensitive business model instead of the then-more-common  business plan or  strategy ? Streeter (2011) has noted that, in the 1980s, particularly in North America, the dramatic rise of microcomputers was generally framed within an entrepreneurial narrative, with heavy emphasis on new start-ups and young entrepreneurs like Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. Meanwhile, most of the news coverage paid little attention to the necessary background industrial contexts (e.g. Intel, Xerox PARC) and for the most part ignored the very important technological developments in computer networking of the period, such as the shift of Arpanet technologies towards NSFNET and what would become the internet, the spread of ethernet local area networks, and the development of relatively horizontal collaborative design strategies that led to innovations like VLSI computer chips and software systems understood as open collaborative environments, particularly around Unix. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Sun Microsystems, founded in 1982, was unique in computer start-ups of the 1980s in that it was not just selling boxes or packaged software. Sun Microsystems had an initial customer base in research universities which valued collaboration. It based its  workstations  more capable and expensive than PCs, but cheaper than minicomputers  on Berkeley s Unix and the open collaborative style it brought with it. Sun therefore adopted the then-counterintuitive strategy of using open standards for both hardware and software, encouraging others outside the firm to use Sun s standards to build their own, compatible but competing systems. As the decade progressed, this focus on building open standards would lead Sun to develop the Java programming language, the Network File System (NFS), virtualised computing, and other building blocks of today s internet-connected world. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>At the time, however, this approach went against the grain of business thinking. As one analyst put it,  An integral part of competition is to deny rivals access to proprietary technical knowledge. [...] Why, then, would a firm provide rivals easy access to its technical knowledge and encourage entry into its market? (<span class=SpellE>Garud</span> and Kumaraswamy 1993, 351). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Because systems and interconnections were Sun s focus, it did not present a clear set of objects, e.g., stand-alone computers or floppy disks in boxes, that could be sold on a per unit basis. In fact it looked like Sun was giving away knowledge of a type that most companies kept as a proprietary. How was this supposed to work? What exactly was being bought and sold: hardware, software, services, interconnected systems, or access? In the world that Sun was helping to create, who would be selling what to whom? While revenue from various sources seemed to be coming in, the entire process looked vaporous to many observers at the time. The phrases  business plan or  business strategy , which demanded a clear plan for future profits, did not seem adequate to Sun s exploratory, university-adjacent approach. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>In this context, when Sun s CFO reassured the <i>New York Times</i> that Sun had  a sensitive business model , he was not <span class=GramE>offering an explanation for</span> exactly how Sun would make a profit in the future. He was <i>not</i> presenting a clear, uniform, business plan or strategy, a road map for what would be sold to whom for how much; he was not invoking the meaning that later commenters like <span class=SpellE>Magretta</span> have since sought to associate with the term. Instead, speaking of a business model  sensitive to changes in projected revenue acknowledged that future revenue was uncertain, and Sun s management had to be ready to accommodate that unpredictability. Sun s CFO did not want to suggest that given the unpredictability of the situation, management would merely wing it. Calling it a  business model , therefore, allowed him to claim to have something like a plan, but something more flexible, <span class=GramE>more ready</span> for a fluid unpredictable situation, while avoiding the danger of sounding like there was no direction whatsoever. And importantly the term implied it was still a <i>business</i>  that it was not going to become too much like the non-profit university research programs that were its original customers  even if it was unclear who was going to be selling what to whom.</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Most agree that business model s full flowering came with the Netscape IPO and the 1990s dotcom stock bubble that followed in its wake.&nbsp; A financial analyst active in the Netscape IPO, Jen van der Meer, has offered a frank and vivid retrospective sense of the structure of feeling at the time: </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'> [A]s a tech equity analyst scrub in the 90 s, the moment that Netscape went public was a defining and seismic shift in how we all thought about business, models, and technology. [...] Before Netscape, I had an obscure job. No one knew or cared what I did when I said I was an equity analyst covering early stage tech companies. [...] Then all of a sudden, everyone knew about Netscape, and my job was super interesting to people. A taxi driver taking me to JFK for a flight to San Jose asked me if he could get in on the IPO. Netscape was beyond technology  it was an experience that enlivened the imagination and created massive possibilities for what was about to happen. [...] I was suddenly&nbsp;popular at dinner parties (but only for that short&nbsp;blip of time). The fact that the IPO was even accomplished proved&nbsp;that there was an appetite for investors to buy into companies that were not yet profitable. [...] Netscape was the first of its kind. As an analyst, it was difficult to estimate revenue, cost, and profit  because of all of the potential scenarios. It was beyond complicated. [...] I can t remember those original projections, but I do remember staring at that blank screen of zeros, and thinking that the story would be much more complicated than anything that came before it (van der Meer 2015). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>To be fair, van der Meer goes on to argue that the multiple meanings of  business model are a strength; as a business consultant, the term still works for her precisely because its multiple meanings enables moving forward in the face of an uncertain future. But for the purposes of this analysis, the point is that  business model did not signal a eureka moment of great clarity or precision, but allowed people to go forward <i>without</i> that clarity, in the face of deep ambiguity:  I was suddenly popular at dinner parties and  it was beyond complicated . The word emerged in the face of large amounts of capital flowing in a context of wild ambiguity. This was the soil in which the term business model blossomed.</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The phrase business model was useful to managers against a backdrop of ingrained structural uncertainty for two primary reasons. First,  model is more tentative than  plan or  strategy . It allows for the speaker to admit that they are speaking hypothetically, in a world where rapid change is inevitable, including in the character of and boundaries around the  things being sold. Second, prefacing  model with the word  business , ensures that everything stays under the umbrella of capitalism; that much need not be brought into question. Options being explored elsewhere in the world at the time, like France s post-office-sponsored Minitel, were thus kept largely off the table (<span class=SpellE>Mailland</span> and Driscoll 2017), and the views of clever countercultural anti-capitalist internet experts (e.g., <span class=SpellE>Hauben</span>, <span class=SpellE>Hauben</span>, and Truscott 1997; <span class=SpellE>Moglen</span> 1999) could be safely ignored. The term  business model thus allowed one to speak hypothetically about the future in a world where rapid change is inevitable and fundamental questions about who will be selling what to whom are uncertain, but it allows users of the term to avoid the political implications of that uncertainty:  this is after all a <i>business</i> . It allows and encourages private businesses to adopt to blurry and shifting contexts, to allow for pre-market coordination and experimental flexibility organised across sectors while leaving unquestioned the assumption that this will go forward on a for-profit basis<a name="_ftnref6"></a><a href="#_ftn6"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref6'><sup>[6]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref6'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref6'></span>. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>To see how this use of the phrase settled in, fast forward a few years to the moment when what was called  open source software started to catch the attention of the business community around 1998. The surprising emergence of open source software, specifically the GNU/Linux systems, presented an obvious problem for people in the computing business: better software was being created without anyone being directly paid, and thanks to  copyleft , on terms that prevented the creation of conventional property boundaries, of  things that could be exchanged for money; open source licenses <i>required </i>the sharing of source code free of cost<a name="_ftnref7"></a><a href="#_ftn7"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref7'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[7]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref7'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref7'></span>. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Given the Silicon Valley business culture of the day  which generally assumed the market is everything, and privatisation and commodification inevitably more efficient  it was perhaps predictable that many would loudly reject the idea entirely. Bill Gates somewhat hyperbolically claimed,  There are some new modern-day sort of communists, who want to get rid of the incentive for musicians and moviemakers and software makers under various guises. [...] Intellectual property is the incentive system for the products of the future (<span class=SpellE>Kanellos</span> 2005). Microsoft co-founder Steve Ballmer echoed Gates, decrying Linux as  a cancer (Greene 2001). <i>Forbes</i> magazine shared this line of reasoning, scoffing at the open software movement s  usual public image of happy software proles linking arms and singing the  Internationale while freely sharing the fruits of their code-writing labour (Lyons 2003). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The online libertarian movement at first predictably embraced Gates line of reasoning. Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute published an online critique of the open source movement, arguing that  like free love, open-source code is fun, but it s probably not a way to run the world. . . . for the most part, the prospect of becoming fabulously wealthy, not the desire to give things away, drives software innovation (<span class=SpellE>Gattuso</span> 1998). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>But the problem with this scoffing was that Linux worked  it crashed less often than the contemporary Windows 95  and it solved coordination problems for industry, working as a kind of shared standard on top of which other software services could be delivered. In 1998, under pressure from the Microsoft monopoly, Netscape open sourced its browser to much acclaim, various prominent businesses, like Apple and IBM, began flirting with open source operating systems, and the governments of China and Brazil would explore Linux as an alternative to dependence on the Microsoft monopoly. According to orthodox libertarian theory, Linux should not be successful, but it was. And perhaps just as importantly, Linux gained a kind of countercultural cachet. It was cool. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>In 1998, leading internet libertarian Esther Dyson sensed the political danger for libertarian principles here, and intervened. Responding to <span class=SpellE>Crewes</span>, she wrote, </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'> There's a fundamental misunderstanding here. There is a lot of value  and money  floating around the world of [Open Source]. And yes, Netscape's use of OS to make its other services attractive is a legitimate, acknowledged and sensible business model. [& ] (It seems to me that there are religious extremists on both sides of what ought to be an argument about business models, not morality) (Dyson 1998).</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>The word  business model here performs a specific function: it allows Dyson to talk favourably about open source software without appearing to qualify her long standing libertarian free market principles. Again, her use of the term  model clarifies little about how money was to be made from open source beyond  to make its other services attractive , but it allows for a kind of organised imprecision. Netscape s strategy at the time was at best blurry (and ultimately would fail; the company is gone and its browser is now distributed by the non-profit Mozilla). But the point was precisely <i>not</i> to have to argue the political economic specifics. Rather, the phrase  business model allowed Dyson to shift the terms of discussion into a different zone: this is all still a  business (somehow), but we are discussing the zone of <i>modelling</i>, a zone of abstract experimentation. The word  model kept it all safely non-concrete, while modifying it with the adjective  business reassured speakers and listeners alike that, <i>whatever it was, it was still a business</i>. <i>Contra</i> both Bill Gates and internet communitarians, Dyson assured her readers, basic principles of capitalism were not under question. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The phrase  business model , in sum, had a naturalising effect, allowing for all the fluidity and the many non-proprietary, shared processes and forms of coordination across the digital industries to proceed <i>without politicising them</i>. The vagueness of the term was key to its effectiveness. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The term business model thus paved the way for the digitalisation of the media industries. For the media industries, the uncertainties are endemic: is the  thing being sold music or copyrights or clicks or subscriptions or access or audience data? One could frame this as a political question: how should we as a society organise the production of information and media? But as long as the initial question is  what s the business model? the discussion gets channelled into a largely for-profit universe, keeping non-profit alternatives off the table.  Model allows for the speculative and fluid character of things: something that is proprietary today might be given away for free tomorrow and vice versa. But keeping the idea that it is in any case a  business structured into the language forecloses the possibility of construing the decisions as the political choices they are. </p> <h1><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt'>4.</span></b><b><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></b><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'> Monetise 2000-2017<o:p></o:p></span></b></h1> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>If the phrase business model took off alongside the internet, monetise took off alongside social media. And just as  business model saw a dip in use as the collapse of the dot com bubble cast a darker light on internet businesses,  monetise saw a dip after the 2016 U.S. election and related events which cast a cloud over social media. Like  business model ,  monetise began to appear with new meanings in the 1990s, but it did not become widely popular until around 2004. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Monetisation did have a pre-internet meaning which is still sometimes invoked: in traditional economics to monetise is to turn something into some form of currency, into something that can be used as legal tender. This is what governments do when they monetise their debt; it s an indirect way of selling off their debt by increasing the money supply. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>But starting in the early 1990s a new, less specific use started to become popular in the media industries, reflected in press coverage. It now is often used to mean something like  earn money from , as in  strategies for monetising user activity or  rules for monetising a YouTube channel .&nbsp; </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;text-indent:0cm'><span style='mso-no-proof:yes'><img border=0 width=600 id="_x0000_i1026" src="http://triple-c.at/f/streeter_f2.jpg" alt="Chart, line chart&#10;&#10;Description automatically generated"></span></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center;text-indent:0cm'>Figure 2</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>The contemporary use of the term seems to have appeared in embryonic form around 1992, at first in the context of media industries rather than computer networking. That year, Time Warner announced it wanted to  monetise its investment in Turner Broadcasting , with whom Time Warner had recently merged (<span class=SpellE>Wollenberg</span> 1992). The term seemed to mean that Time Warner intended to start exploiting Turner s libraries of old movies and TV shows, a relatively new way to think about the media business at the time, as essentially an intellectual property business rather than a media production business. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>After that announcement, the term started appearing in articles about the Time Warner/Turner deal, but reflecting some scepticism, usually by way of scare quotes. A 1994 piece, for example, noted that,  Time Warner has said for more than a year that it would like to 'monetise' its Turner Broadcasting stake, and the two companies have had talks about ways to accomplish that (Dow Jones 1994). A year later, <i>Variety</i> put it even more snidely: </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='margin-left:35.45pt;text-indent:0cm'> Corporate types also busy themselves framing  strategic alliances, which often involve entities with which their own companies have no common interests. If such an alliance doesn't work, the corporatists can always  monetise it  they like to&nbsp;monetise&nbsp;things, which is a polite way of making it disappear into fiscal cyberspace (Bart 1995).</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>In 2000, the NYT was still using scare quotes:  Mr. Jobs stressed that [Apple] believed that it could  monetise its new Internet strategy easily (Markoff 2000). But by then the term was coming to be accepted to mean, roughly, a hope of turning vaporous entities and activities into a revenue stream, into a way to make money. It was typically expressed more as a hope than a plan. The term expressed a self-fulfilling confidence that a plan would emerge, while absolving the managerial community of any obligation to provide a description of what that plan would be. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>As the decade progressed, the scare quotes began to lose their sense of scepticism, and eventually disappeared. Much of this had to do with the rise of Facebook. In 2007, an article about a social media software developers conference noted,  Apps are just one way mainstream companies are looking to profit off [Facebook], or  monetise it - a term constantly thrown around by e-commerce types (<span class=SpellE>Barmak</span> 2007). The following year, the scare quotes were largely gone. For example, in October 2008, Facebook CEO Zuckerberg was quoted  I don't think social networks can be monetised in the same way that search did [...] In three years from now we have to figure out what the optimum model is. But that is not our primary focus today (Kafka 2008). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Significantly, Facebook was hugely capitalised and rapidly growing in membership at the time, but it was not making a profit, and as the quote from Zuckerberg makes clear, did not have a clear plan about how it would do so.  Monetise became a commonplace term around the rise of social media, <i>not</i> because it explained how anyone was making money. Like business model, the word was most often invoked <i>precisely when the way people would make money was uncertain</i>, not when it was known. At the same time,  monetise addressed the anxieties about profitability generated by the dotcom bubble collapse: it wasn t just a model. The word implied that this time, money would be made, somehow. Monetise invoked an unknown but expected future state where buying and selling, the making of money, would no longer be unclear. Monetise also had a continued life inside Hollywood, a life which was energised by the collision of Hollywood with the internet. For example, a 2009 article about coming changes in  the film industry s business model warned,  even when the studios figure out how to monetise movie delivery via the Internet, they won't be making anywhere near $15 per download (Strauss 2009). In 2011, in an article about NBC s strategy shift towards  higher quality content , <i>The New York Post</i> quoted an industry executive saying  [NBC] is putting  content before commerce [...] Content will be the top priority before seeing how you monetise it  (Atkinson 2011). </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Significantly, very often the subject of the verb monetise was not individuals or firms, but&nbsp; industries and industry segments. Social networks monetised, not Facebook.  The studios would figure out how to monetise streaming. NBC would have to  see how you monetise it , i.e., see how it is monetised industry-wide, not monetise it by itself. A specific firm or individual business person may be looking for a business model, but does not  monetise. Monetisation, at the time it came into widespread use, was generally imagined as a collective action. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Monetise in this period was roughly synonymous with the Marxist sense of  commodify , meaning a process of abstracting human activities into quantifiable units that generate surplus value (<span class=SpellE>Frow</span> 2021). But unlike commodify, monetise sounded technical and financial, not political. It allowed for a public discussion of how to turn non-capitalist, collective activities into something that could be bought and sold. It s not just that the business world would rather create their own terms instead of use dreaded Marxist ones; it s that there was a felt need for a term that gives voice to the collective project of turning human activities into things that can be bought and sold, the collective effort to find shared ways to draw property and contract boundaries in a way that allows for capital accumulation, without opening the door to the politicisation of those acts, to a truly open discussion about what should be done with our media industries. The word monetisation makes available the social architectures of commodification while keeping the necessary collective action safely inside capitalist bounds. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>What the term monetise enabled in the end was a context for firms like Facebook to expend staggering amounts of investor capital to establish monopoly-sized user bases by offering services for  free prior to establishing any concrete plan for profit and the political difficulties that such plans can bring. Only after that monopoly of users is established need a firm bring down the walls of commodification, at a point when the firms dominance seems a fait accompli, when neither competitors nor users seem to have any choice in the matter. </p> <h1><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning: 18.0pt'>5.</span></b><b><span style='font-size:7.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'>&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></b><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-font-kerning:18.0pt'>Conclusion<o:p></o:p></span></b></h1> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>The goals of this essay have been twofold. First, I have shown how industry buzzwords need not be taken as transparent.<a name="_ftnref8"></a><a href="#_ftn8"><span style='mso-bookmark: _ftnref8'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[8]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref8'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref8'></span> As media industries scholar Amanda <span class=SpellE>Lotz</span> put it,  [o]<span class=SpellE>ur</span> remit as critical scholars is to make it strange (<span class=SpellE>Lotz</span> 2019). At a minimum, we should consider alternative terminologies with clearer meanings, such as commodify instead of monetise, or regime of accumulation (<span class=SpellE>Lipietz</span> 1986) instead of business model; both critical terms bring needed attention to the contingent political conditions necessary to specific economic relations. Beyond that, we should focus on the contradictory dynamics of how the terms are used, e.g., how the vagueness of terms may not be a simple flaw but useful to industrial communities struggling to organise the commodification of intangibles. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>The second goal of this essay has been to suggest that attention to the specificities of discourse might sharpen the understandings of cause and effect in the analysis of political economic change. If my claims about the potential functions of business model and monetisation bear weight, if the terms causal role was not one of reflection or obfuscation but of function, then business argot is a site of political struggles over the development of economic relations over time.  Business model did not arise as an explanation for, say, how Amazon.com transformed retail; it became popular several years before Amazon did, and by creating a terrain within which experiments with radical new ways of conducting business could take place, contributed to the conditions in which businesses like Amazon could arise. Vaguely defined buzzwords do not merely legitimate or obscure after the fact; in these cases, they build particular kinds of terrain for addressing uncertainties, opening up some possibilities while shutting down others. The buzzwords were not created by neoliberal ideologies. Rather, they helped create the conditions for the ideologies rise to dominance. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Since the proliferation of  business model in 1990, it and related buzzwords helped smooth the way for digital media technologies to be thoroughly integrated with global capitalism. From Google to Facebook to Zoom and beyond, giving away services for free to establish large user bases before having any clear plan about how to make a profit is now considered entirely routine rather than deeply irrational. Under the umbrella of  monetisation , digital delivery of audio visual media over the internet, not long ago considered a crisis, has become a driver of the global economy. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Yet the exact nature of what has transpired is still open to debate. While it is clear that digitalisation has been associated with new patterns for organising political economic relations, there is no consensus on how best to characterise them. The literature seeking to explain the peculiarities of contemporary  capitalism without capital is characterised by a proliferation of theories and terminologies: platform capitalism, surveillance capitalism, financialisation, <span class=SpellE>assetisation</span>, and more (e.g., <span class=SpellE>Srnicek</span> 2016; <span class=SpellE>Haskel</span> and Westlake 2017; <span class=SpellE>Boltanski</span> and <span class=SpellE>Chiapello</span> 2018; Birch and <span class=SpellE>Muniesa</span> 2020; <span class=SpellE>Zuboff</span> 2020). While Raymond Williams would agree that is essential to understand dominant social patterns and structures, he might caution us not to make our theories more precise than the phenomena they are trying to describe, and to remember the necessary connection to lived experience. Marxist analysis is not inevitably functionalist and teleological, but the effort to specify structures does risk assuming more stability than is really there (Wright 1983). Sometimes capitalism involves a certain amount of  muddling through . </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>A focus on managerial argot thus helps foreground the <i>contingencies</i> of capitalism. The success of internet fuelled patterns of investment, ownership, and control, from Google through Facebook to Netflix and beyond, was not unprecedented. As historians of the media industries are generally aware, over the long term, the construction of what gets sold to whom is often an open question, subject to uncertainty and political struggles. Strategies have ranged widely over the decades, from ticket booths to license fees to advertising to subscriptions to copyright collectives and more. When digitalisation began to introduce new possibilities of reproduction and dissemination in the 1980s, this was just another in a long line of industrial conundrums that get gradually resolved, often a bit uneasily, over periods of years or decades. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Nor should we reproduce the dominant view that those resolutions were inevitable. Historically, the commodification of communications has often been awkward and incomplete; think of the many things from recipes to fashion designs to book titles that have escaped the enclosures of copyright expansion, or the awkward political compromises sometimes embedded in institutions like copyright collectives or radio spectrum regulations in the public interest. And today, in the wake of the political crises associated with social media since the political crises of 2016 and since, the  business models of the platform giants are almost certain to be subject to political intervention in many parts of the world. Given the fact of capital accumulation, pressure to commodify is perhaps constant. But it is not always unstoppable, and the ways struggles play out are in part shaped by the peculiarities of human circumstances, by things like language and everyday experience. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>This analysis is intended to be suggestive, not complete. We need to look at other examples of managerial argot  Moore s law, intellectual property, branding, synergy, innovation, and disruption all come to mind  and explore some of the relations between them and particular industry behaviours. The analysis of argot would have to be weighed alongside other kinds of explanations, especially economic ones, to shed sharper light on how argot does and does not function in particular contexts and how it works alongside other forces.</p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>Finally, as scholars we might keep our eyes on the role of argot as a site of contemporary struggles. It is not inevitable that  monetisation stays depoliticising. A recent best seller, for example, discusses the  monetisation of the self in critical detail, and does tie it to  runaway capitalism (Tolentino 2019). Similarly, Kate Crawford has convincingly argued that AI  is neither artificial nor intelligent (Crawford 2021; <span class=SpellE>Simonite</span> 2021). If that is true, we might ask, what about the term and the current context makes it nonetheless useful, and for whom? And rather than invoking the term uncritically as part of an effort to intervene (by calling for, say,  ethical AI ), might it make more sense to inject alternate terminologies into the discussion (e.g., machine learning), to make word choice a strategy in building alternate futures? Similar concerns might be applied to any number of vague terms currently attracting managerial enthusiasm: the smart home, innovation, stakeholders, internet of things, influencer, analytics, and more. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:14.2pt'>David Harvey has pointed to the  foundational contradictions of capital , including the contradictions between capital and state and between capital as process and capital as thing, i.e.,  the tension between fixity and motion within the circulation of capital (Harvey 2015, 38, 75). Harvey is well aware that over time capitalism has proven adept at managing those contradictions. But flagging them as fundamental contradictions reminds us they will not go away. Markets, private property, and other keystones of capitalism require ongoing, elaborate, extra-market social coordination which predictably creates ongoing contradictions or tensions. Digital media technologies make vivid the fact that markets are made, not born, and their making and continued existence require elaborate non-market social structures, which is inherently troubling to the notion that markets, property, and the laws of contract are somehow free or natural or inevitable<a name="_ftnref9"></a><a href="#_ftn9"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref9'><sup>[9]</sup></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref9'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftnref9'></span>. The historical patterns of the emergence and flowering of business model and monetisation suggest that these tensions are constantly struggled over inside industry as well as out, and that, as analysts and users of industries and of language, we have our own parts to play in those struggles. The vagueness of these terms might serve as a hint that more, not less, is going on. </p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'><br> <b>References</b></p> <p class=MsoNormal style='text-indent:0cm'>&nbsp;</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Atkinson, Claire. 2011. Shill Stoppers. <i>New York Post</i>, May 17, 2011. <a href="https://nypost.com/2011/05/17/shill-stoppers/">https://nypost.com/2011/05/17/shill-stoppers/</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Baden-Fuller, Charles, and Mary S. Morgan. 2010. Business Models as Models. <i>Long Range Planning</i> 43 (2): 156 71. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.02.005</a></p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Barmak</span>, Sarah. 2007. Searching for Gold in Them, Thar Online Networks and Finding It. <i>The Toronto Star</i>. August 11, 2007.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Bart, Peter. 1995. Suiting Up. <i>Variety</i>. March 19, 1995. <a href="https://variety.com/1995/scene/markets-festivals/suiting-up-99124048/">https://variety.com/1995/scene/markets-festivals/suiting-up-99124048/</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Bell, C. G. 1984. The Mini and Micro Industries. <i>Computer</i> 17 (10): 14 30. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1984.1658955">https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.1984.1658955</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Birch, Kean, and Fabian <span class=SpellE>Muniesa</span>, eds. 2020. <span class=SpellE><i>Assetization</i></span><i>: Turning Things into Assets in <span class=SpellE>Technoscientific</span> Capitalism</i>. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Boltanski</span>, Luc, and Eve <span class=SpellE>Chiapello</span>. 2018. <i>The New Spirit of Capitalism</i>. Translated by Gregory Elliott. London: Verso. Reprint edition.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Business, n. n.d. In <i>Oxford English Dictionary Online</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed August 24, 2022. <a href="http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/25229">http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/25229</a> .</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Caldwell, John Thornton. 2008. <i>Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television</i>. Durham, N.C: Duke <span class=SpellE>Univ</span> Pr.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Codrea<span style='font-family:"Cambria Math",serif'> </span>Rado</span>, Anna. 2013. Until the 1990s, Companies Didn t Have  Business Models . <i>Quartz</i>. April 17, 2013. <a href="https://qz.com/71489/until-the-nineties-business-models-werent-a-thing/">https://qz.com/71489/until-the-nineties-business-models-werent-a-thing/</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Couldry</span>, Nick, and Ulises A. <span class=SpellE>Mejias</span>. 2019. <i>The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism</i>. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Crawford, Kate. 2021. <i>Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence</i>. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Doganova</span>, Liliana, and Fabian <span class=SpellE>Muniesa</span>. 2015. Capitalization Devices: Business Models and the Renewal of Markets. In <i>Making Things Valuable</i>, 109-125. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.003.0006">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.003.0006</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Dow Jones. 1994. Turner Board May Look at CBS Bid. <i>The Financial Post</i>. July 23, 1994, Weekly Edition <span class=SpellE>edition</span>.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Dyson, Esther. 1998. FC: Re: Competitive Enterprise Institute Blasts Open-Source Software. December 9, 1998. <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/p-00128.html">http://www.politechbot.com/p-00128.html</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Frow</span>, John. 2021. Commodification. In <i>Information: A Historical Companion</i>, edited by Ann Blair, Paul Duguid, Anja-Silvia <span class=SpellE>Goeing</span>, and Anthony Grafton, 374-378. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Garud</span>, Raghu, and <span class=SpellE>Arun</span> Kumaraswamy. 1993. Changing Competitive Dynamics in Network Industries: An Exploration of Sun Microsystems Open Systems Strategy. <i>Strategic Management Journal</i> 14 (5): 351-369.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Gattuso</span>, James. 1998. Latest C:\spin from the Competitive Enterprise Institute. December 8, 1998. <a href="http://www.politechbot.com/p-00120.html">http://www.politechbot.com/p-00120.html</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Ghaziani</span>, Amin, and Marc J. <span class=SpellE>Ventresca</span>. 2005. Keywords and Cultural Change: Frame Analysis of Business Model Public Talk, 1975-2000. <i>Sociological Forum</i> 20 (4): 523-559.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Greene, Thomas C. 2001. Ballmer:  Linux Is a Cancer : Contaminates All Other Software with Hippie GPL Rubbish. <i>The Register</i>. June 2, 2001. <a href="https://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_cancer">https://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/06/02/ballmer_linux_is_a_cancer</a></p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Harvey, David. 2015. <i>Seventeen Contradictions and the End of Capitalism</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Haskel</span>, Jonathan, and <span class=SpellE>Stian</span> Westlake. 2017. <i>Capitalism Without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy</i>. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Hauben</span>, Michael, Ronda <span class=SpellE>Hauben</span>, and Thomas Truscott. 1997. <i>Netizens: On the History and Impact of Usenet and the Internet</i>. New York: Wiley-IEEE Computer Society Pr.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Hedman</span>, Jonas, and Thomas <span class=SpellE>Kalling</span>. 2003. The Business Model Concept: Theoretical Underpinnings and Empirical Illustrations. <i>European Journal of Information Systems</i> 12 (1): 49-59. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446">https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000446</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Jessop, Bob. 2004. Critical Semiotic Analysis and Cultural Political Economy. <i>Critical Discourse Studies</i> 1 (2): 159-174. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674506">https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900410001674506</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Kafka, Peter. 2008. Zuckerberg: Facebook Will Have A Business Plan In Three Years. <i>Business Insider</i>. October 9, 2008. <a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/2008/10/zuckerberg-facebook-will-have-a-business-plan-in-three-years">https://www.businessinsider.com/2008/10/zuckerberg-facebook-will-have-a-business-plan-in-three-years</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Kanellos</span>, Michael. 2005. Gates Taking a Seat in Your Den - CNET News. <span class=SpellE><i>CNet</i></span><i> News</i>. January 5, 2005. <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Gates-taking-a-seat-in-your-den/2008-1041_3-5514121.html">http://news.cnet.com/Gates-taking-a-seat-in-your-den/2008-1041_3-5514121.html</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Kopp, Carol M. 2020. Understanding Business Models. <i>Investopedia</i>. July 3, 2020. <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businessmodel.asp">https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businessmodel.asp</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Lawrence, Andrew. 1990. Using Computers in Business 7;Client-Server Systems Bring the Team Workers Together. <i>Financial Times</i>. October 16, 1990, sec. Business.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Lewis, Michael. 1999. <i>The New <span class=SpellE>New</span> Thing/ : A Silicon Valley Story</i>. New York: W. W. Norton &amp; Company.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Lipietz</span>, Alain. 1986. Behind the Crisis: The Exhaustion of a Regime of Accumulation. A  Regulation School Perspective on Some French Empirical Works. <i>Review of Radical Political Economics</i> 18 (1 2): 13 32. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/048661348601800102">https://doi.org/10.1177/048661348601800102</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Lotz</span>, Amanda D. 2022. <i>Netflix and Streaming Video: The Business of Subscriber-Funded Video on Demand</i>. Cambridge, UK/ ; Medford, MA, USA: Polity.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Lotz</span>, Amanda. 2019. <i>Category Errors in Streaming Debates: A Presentation to the International Communication Association</i>. Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Washington D.C., May 27.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Lyons, Daniel. 2003. Software: Linux s Hit Men. <i>Forbes</i>, October 14, 2003. <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html">http://www.forbes.com/2003/10/14/cz_dl_1014linksys.html</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Magretta</span>, Joan. 2002. Why Business Models Matter. <i>Harvard Business Review</i>, May 1, 2002. <a href="https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter">https://hbr.org/2002/05/why-business-models-matter</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Markoff, John. 2000. Jobs Drops `Interim From Title at Apple. <i>New York Times</i>, January 6, 2000, sec. Technology. <a href="https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/01/biztech/articles/06apple.html">https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/01/biztech/articles/06apple.html</a></p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Markoff, John. 1990. Sun Microsystems Puts Limits on Spending. <i>New York Times</i>. October 6, 1990, sec. 1.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Meer, Jen van der. 2015. The Day the Business Model Was Born  A Personal History. <i>Reason Street</i>. July 24, 2015. <a href="https://reasonstreet.co/2015/07/24/what-is-a-business-model-a-personal-history">https://reasonstreet.co/2015/07/24/what-is-a-business-model-a-personal-history</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Moglen</span>, <span class=SpellE>Eben</span>. 1999. Anarchism Triumphant: Free Software and the Death of Copyright. <i>First Monday</i>, August 1999. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v4i8.684">https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v4i8.684</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Nielsen, Christian, and Morten Lund. 2014. A Brief History of the Business Model Concept. <i>SSRN Electronic Journal</i>, March. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2579439">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2579439</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Oberhelman, David D. 2015. Distant Reading, Computational Stylistics, and Corpus Linguistics: The Critical Theory of Digital Humanities for Literature Subject Librarians. In <i>Digital Humanities in the Library: Challenges and Opportunities for Subject Specialists</i>, edited by Arianne <span class=SpellE>Hartsell</span>-Gundy, Laura Braunstein, and <span class=SpellE>Liorah</span> <span class=SpellE>Golomb</span>, 53-68. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Ovans</span>, Andrea. 2015. What Is a Business Model? <i>Harvard Business Review</i>. January 23, 2015. <a href="https://hbr.org/2015/01/what-is-a-business-model">https://hbr.org/2015/01/what-is-a-business-model</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Simonite</span>, Tom. 2021. This Researcher Says AI Is Neither Artificial nor Intelligent. <i>Wired</i>, April 26, 2021. <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/researcher-says-ai-not-artificial-intelligent/">https://www.wired.com/story/researcher-says-ai-not-artificial-intelligent/</a></p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Srnicek</span>, Nick. 2016. <i>Platform Capitalism</i>. Cambridge: Polity.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Steiner, Linda. 2016.  Wrestling with the Angels : Stuart Hall s Theory and Method. <i>Howard Journal of Communications</i> 27 (2): 102-111. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2016.1148649">https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2016.1148649</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Strauss, Bob. 2009. Disney Shakeup Spotlights Studios Plight: The Film Industry s Business Model Undergoing Major Shift. <i>The Daily News of Los Angeles</i>. September 27, 2009. Valley Edition <span class=SpellE>edition</span>.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Streeter, Thomas. 2011. <i>The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet</i>. New York: NYU Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Tolentino, Jia. 2019. <i>Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion</i>. New York: Random House. Later Printing edition.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Williams, Raymond. 2014. <i>Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society</i>. New York: Oxford University Press. New edition.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Williams, Raymond. 1978. <i>Marxism and Literature</i>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Wollenberg</span>, Skip. 1992. Time Warner, Readers Digest Looks For Double-Digit Profit Growth. <i>AP NEWS</i>. December 10, 1992, sec. Archive. <a href="https://apnews.com/article/2a31ab71182c2829b205d3cb570af84a">https://apnews.com/article/2a31ab71182c2829b205d3cb570af84a</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Wright, Erik Olin. 1983. Is Marxism Really Functionalist, Class Reductionist, and Teleological? <i><span style='color:black'>American Journal of Sociology</span></i><span style='color:black'> </span>89 (2): 452-459.</p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'>Yen, Yi-Wynn. 2008. Why CEOs Soft-Pedal Layoffs - Nov. 11, 2008. <i>CNN Money</i>. November 11, 2008. <a href="https://money.cnn.com/2008/11/10/technology/layoff_terms.fortune/">https://money.cnn.com/2008/11/10/technology/layoff_terms.fortune/</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Zott</span>, Christoph, Raphael Amit, and Lorenzo Massa. 2011. The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future Research. <i>Journal of Management</i> 37 (4): 1019-1042. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311406265">https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311406265</a> </p> <p class=MsoBibliography align=left style='margin-left:14.2pt;text-align:left; text-indent:-14.2pt'><span class=SpellE>Zuboff</span>, Shoshana. 2020. <i>The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power</i>. Reprint edition. New York: <span class=SpellE>PublicAffairs</span>.</p> <h4 style='margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt'><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"'><br> About the Author<br> </span></b><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'><br> </span></b><i style='mso-bidi-font-style:normal'><span style='font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'>Tom Streeter</span></i><span style='font-size: 11.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> is the author of <i>Selling the Air</i><b style='mso-bidi-font-weight:normal'> </b>(1996) and <i>The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet </i>(2011), and, with Zephyr <span class=SpellE>Teachout</span>, editor of <i>Mousepads, Shoe Leather, and Hope</i> (2007).</span><b><span style='mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'><o:p></o:p></span></b></h4> <p class=MsoNormal>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </p> <div> <p class=MsoNormal align=left style='text-align:left;text-indent:0cm'><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"'><br clear=all style='mso-special-character:line-break'> <o:p></o:p></span></p> <div class=MsoNormal align=left style='text-align:left;text-indent:0cm'><span style='font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-no-proof:yes'> <hr size=1 width="33%" align=left> </span></div> <div id=ftn1> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn1"></a><a href="#_ftnref1"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn1'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[1]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn1'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn1'></span> <span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language: EN-CA'> Argot ,  jargon ,  technolect , and  terms of art are often used to refer to specialized language peculiar to a specific occupation or community involved in specialized tasks. I prefer the term  argot in this context to avoid the narrowly functional and positive connotations of  terms of art or  technolect and the often derisive and negative connotations of  jargon . </span></p> </div> <div id=ftn2> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn2"></a><a href="#_ftnref2"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn2'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[2]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn2'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn2'></span> The Oxford English Dictionary finds an example of  business model in the sense of a  type of product tailored towards business use dating back to 1832. However, the earliest example it lists for the contemporary meaning of  a plan for the successful operation of a business is 2009 ( Business, n. n.d.). </p> </div> <div id=ftn3> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn3"></a><a href="#_ftnref3"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn3'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[3]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn3'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn3'></span> Before 1990, less than ten articles per year contained the phrase  business model, and most of those were not in anything like the contemporary sense. For example, the  business model of X could refer to a version of a device intended for business instead of for consumers. Another pre-1990 meaning was  doing things like businesses do as in a university adopting a  business model for organizing its finances instead of a traditional university model.</p> </div> <div id=ftn4> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn4"></a><a href="#_ftnref4"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn4'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[4]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn4'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn4'></span> Figure 1 stops in <span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language:EN-CA'>2006 because after that,  business model became so common and the numbers so large that the vague meanings lampooned by Michael Lewis would seem to have won out in common discourse, making year by year measurements both difficult and fairly meaningless. <span class=SpellE>Ngram</span> analysis suggests that  business model was becoming interchangeable with  business plan by 2006 </span>(van der Meer 2015)<span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language:EN-CA'>.</span></p> </div> <div id=ftn5> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn5"></a><a href="#_ftnref5"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn5'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[5]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn5'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn5'></span> <span class=SpellE><span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language:EN-CA'>Magretta</span></span><span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language:EN-CA'> </span>(2002)<span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language:EN-CA'> links the rise of  business model to the rise of spreadsheet software, which with the appearance of cheap personal computers, made relatively complex modeling of business inputs and outputs more widely accessible. </span></p> </div> <div id=ftn6> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:7.1pt;text-indent:-7.1pt'><a name="_ftn6"></a><a href="#_ftnref6"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn6'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[6]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn6'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn6'></span> <span class=SpellE>Doganova</span> and <span class=SpellE>Muniesa</span> (2015) argue that business models are devices with the capacity  to orchestrate encounters and, in so doing, to transform a priori non-economic entities (such as a genetic engineering technology) into assets that generate streams of future revenues, that is, into capital. This is in some ways close to the analysis being offered here, though it focuses on a few successful outcomes rather than generalized use, which risks tautology. </p> </div> <div id=ftn7> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn7"></a><a href="#_ftnref7"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn7'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[7]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn7'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn7'></span> <span lang=EN-US style='mso-ansi-language: EN-US'>The discussion that follows uses the term  open source rather than FOSS because it was the term  open source that the business community was reacting to. The philosophical differences between open source and FOSS, while significant, are a separate matter. </span></p> </div> <div id=ftn8> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn8"></a><a href="#_ftnref8"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn8'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[8]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn8'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn8'></span> For examples of excellent critical scholarship that sometimes takes industry terms for granted, consider the passing references to business models in Caldwell (2008) or <span class=SpellE>Couldry</span> and <span class=SpellE>Mejias</span> (2019), or to monetise/monetisation in <span class=SpellE>Lotz</span> (2022). </p> </div> <div id=ftn9> <p class=MsoFootnoteText style='margin-left:14.7pt;text-indent:-14.2pt'><a name="_ftn9"></a><a href="#_ftnref9"><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn9'><span class=MsoFootnoteReference>[9]</span></span><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn9'></span></a><span style='mso-bookmark:_ftn9'></span> <span lang=EN-CA style='mso-ansi-language: EN-CA'>One could also frame this in terms of the Weberian tradition of economic sociology, which explores cultural and social preconditions for the creation of capitalist economic conditions. See, e.g., </span><span class=SpellE>Trigilia</span> (2008)</p> </div> </div> </div> </body> </html>